Landing-page archive
Browse startup websites presented as individual exhibits, with newer entries and a full archive view.
shitfa.st is a satirical archive of startup landing pages that appear generic or AI-generated. It documents examples with screenshots, scorecards, taxonomy-based critiques, and a browseable archive.
shitfa.st is an editorial archive focused on suspiciously polished startup landing pages and recurring patterns associated with generic or AI-generated marketing sites. It combines collected page examples with screenshots, scorecards, taxonomies, and specific written critiques.
The site documents signals such as dense feature grids, vague value propositions, unexplained authority logos, fabricated-looking social proof, missing product demonstrations, waitlists in place of products, roadmap theatre, SEO-first copy, and “AI agents” messaging. Readers can browse individual case files, apply quick filters, and explore curated collections such as the Elite Slop wing.
A homepage checklist lets visitors assess a startup homepage against the same kinds of tropes used by the editorial desk. The available site content presents shitfa.st as an editorial archive and critique format, not as a website builder, analytics platform, or documented integrations product.
Browse startup websites presented as individual exhibits, with newer entries and a full archive view.
Open a specific site review for its ShitScore, evidence summary, score breakdown, screenshot, editorial notes, and related archive entries.
Explore named patterns including gradient dependency, three-card feature grids, scroll animation as proof, authority-logo hallucinations, testimonial uncertainty, waitlist-as-product, roadmap theatre, B2B sludge, SEO hustle, and AI-agent recursion.
Compare entries using a 0–100 ShitScore and dimension scores for areas such as prompt residue, feature-grid density, value-proposition vagueness, trust-signal suspicion, product-proof absence, and ShipFast resemblance.
Score a startup homepage by checking for common tropes, including generic hero copy, unsubstantiated trust bars, absent product screenshots, inflated trust numbers, and waitlists without a visible product.
Use the taxonomy and checklist to examine a startup homepage for generic copy, weak product proof, repetitive layouts, or questionable trust signals.
Browse case files and evidence logs to study how recurring SaaS landing-page conventions appear across different sites.
Compare a site’s feature structure, hero language, social proof, and visual patterns against documented examples rather than reviewing them in isolation.
Filter the collection, open individual exhibits, and explore curated selections such as the permanent Elite Slop collection or weekly awards.
It is a satirical editorial archive of startup landing pages that share generic, highly polished, or apparently AI-generated patterns.
A case file can include the reviewed domain, ShitScore, dimension-by-dimension scores, an evidence log with a screenshot, editorial observations, and links to related archive entries.
Yes. The homepage includes an interactive checklist that calculates a live ShitScore from selected landing-page tropes.
No. The examples include SaaS, developer tools, AI products, and other startup websites. The focus is on the page’s patterns and claims, not solely on the product category.
The available site content presents it as an editorial archive and critique format. It does not document website-building, analytics, integrations, or a conventional paid product workflow.
Traffic data is for reference only.