Market scanning from public sources
Reads signals from Reddit, app stores, Hacker News, the open web, and similar sources to surface complaints and unmet needs in a market.
ShouldBuild helps founders validate an idea by scanning market complaints, reviews, threads, and competitor signals, then turning them into a market report and roadmap. It is aimed at people deciding what to build next and whether the opportunity is worth pursuing.

ShouldBuild analyzes public complaints, reviews, threads, and other market signals to help founders decide whether an idea is worth building. It combines those findings into a report with a verdict, supporting quotes, competitor context, and a roadmap-oriented view of what to do next.
The product is built around a repeatable workflow: discover gaps in a market, validate a concept, decide what makes the cut, turn research into backlog items, and revisit the market later to see what changed. The site positions this as a way to avoid spending months building before learning whether demand is real.
Reads signals from Reddit, app stores, Hacker News, the open web, and similar sources to surface complaints and unmet needs in a market.
Generates a plain-language judgment such as build, build with caution, depends on niche, or not worth it, based on the evidence it finds.
Each finding is backed by quotes and links to the source post or review, so users can review the underlying signal rather than just a summary.
Shows how an idea sits among rivals and highlights whether a category is crowded, saturated, or still has openings.
Lets users save findings on a board, sort them by decision state, and turn selected insights into backlog tasks.
Re-checks competitors, prices, ratings, and new complaints over time so users can compare a new run against prior research.
A founder can describe an idea and get a research-backed verdict before spending time on design or development.
Users can enter a market, such as a category of apps, and review the gaps and pain points that real users keep mentioning.
The report helps teams see whether a space is dominated by existing leaders or whether there is room for a narrower wedge.
Findings can be moved into a board or backlog so the output from research becomes specific product work instead of a dead-end report.
Teams can revisit a category over time to track new complaints, pricing changes, rating shifts, and newly opened opportunities.
It scans public market signals such as complaints, reviews, and threads, then turns them into a report that helps you decide whether to build an idea and what to do next.
The homepage mentions Reddit, app stores, Hacker News, the open web, and example sources such as Product Hunt and major app stores.
Yes. The reports shown on the site include judgments such as build with caution, depends on niche, and not worth it.
Yes. The site shows an ideas board and backlog flow where findings can be saved, categorized, and turned into tasks.
The public pricing page mainly shows sign-in and sign-up entry points, so the site does not expose detailed plan information in the collected pages.